David Hundeyin, once again, criticizes the United States over its policy of canceling visas and deporting foreigners that go against what the Government termed as “anti-American” views.
He wondered why the U.S. takes pride in itself as the land of the free and shames countries like China, Iran, and co, for not allowing total freedom to its people, yet, they go on a manhunt to cancel/deny visas to people that say or support what they don’t like on social media, and deport residents.
David Hundeyin noted that none of the countries that the American-controlled media portrays as operating “repressive regimes” with “social credit systems which do not allow free speech have ever “cancelled anybody’s visa for tweeting things that their government didn’t like”.
Hundeyin’s post was a response to the US Department of State announcing that they had revoked the visas of several people who celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The department also said that the process of identification was still ongoing.
The Nigerian investigative journalist said the move transcends Kirk and was an instrument of the US Government to scare and bully people, never to complain or say anything that the Government does not like.
He likened it to the “chilling effect” and joins other critics who berate the United States Government for always interfering and controlling the economies of other countries by “liberating” them from their oppressive governments and giving the people freedom, even if the act in question is alien and goes against the core culture and values of the people.
Charlie Kirk was a far-right activist and pro-Israeli supporter who started having a change of mind towards the Israeli Government before his death. His opposition to abortion, gays, and the LGBTQIA ideology set him at loggerheads with many, who then celebrated his death on social media.
The US move to remove this set of people also created more ripples.
Many argue that if America were truly a land of the free and supports freedom of speech, then people should be free to express how they feel about the death of a person, only if they do not show support for the manner of death, which, in Kirk’s case, was via assassination, which is a crime.
Charlie Kirk also supported individual gun ownership and said that killings with the use of firearms, which include mass shootings, were a necessary cost to pay.
However, when people said he rightfully paid the “cost” of the law he wanted, those people, too, were marked for deportation by the State.
Consular Accountability Project To Fight For Affected Migrants For Free
Following the visa revocation, Immigration attorney Eric Lee announced that the Consular Accountability Project will be representing in court for free, anyone whose visa was denied or revoked due to their actions following the death of Charlie Kirk.
Let's Hear Your Opinion About Us. Rate Us On:
