The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has not only led to a national conversation about gun violence and ideologies in the United States, but has also sparked an online buzz discussing predictive programming stemming from the 1998 Nicolas Cage film titled “Snake Eyes (CageSnake Eyes)“.
The many similarities between the “Snake Eyes” movie and the shooting of Charlie Kirk have opened the trending topic of “predictive programming”, which is basically the idea that real-life events are predicted, seeded or foreshadowed movies and cartoons, and that when people massively watch these on screens and do not detect and counter it, they ignorantly agree to it and it comes to past in the future.
As usual, while no “authoritative source has drawn an actual professional connection between the ‘fictional movie’ and the real-life crime”, the “eerie coincidences” pointed out by social media users are just too many, and deserve to be reported.
From the name of the assassinated political figures both in the movie and reality similar; Charles (Charlie) and Kirkland (Kirk), the date of the assassination being the same, expect for the year, the movie actor being shot at the left side of his neck like the real life Charlie at an event, as well as the presence of a Tyler connected to the shooting.
Of course, the all-seeing eye is present in the 25-year-old movie, and is still a usual symbol and hand gesture sign in movies, music, and among celebrities.
But do not conclude on anything until the approved authorities tell you, after all, the movie itself said you should not believe everything except your own eyes. And hey, if you think the connections are just too many and more than a mere coincidence and try to connect the very conspicuous dots laid out before your own very eyes, you are rightfully to be tagged a “conspiracy theorist”.
With that, let us itemize the many similarities that movie analysts all over YouTube and other media reports have identified between the “Snake Eyes” movie by Nicholas Cage and the actual shooting of Charlie Kirk.
1. The Names: Charles Kirkland vs. Charlie Kirk
This is the central pillar of the theory.
- In the Movie: The victim of the high-profile assassination at a boxing match is U.S. Defense Secretary Charles Kirkland.
- In Reality: The name of the deceased is Charles Kirk.
2. The Date of the Assassination In The Movie And Real-Life
- In the Movie: The assassination of Charles Kirkland happened on September 10, as seen on a promotional board of the main event the political figure came for.
- In Reality: Charlie Kirk was also fatally shot and killed on September 10 in a public event.
3. The Suspect and Character Names: “Tyler”
Another striking detail is the partial overlap in names related to the crime and the movie’s characters.
- In the Movie: The boxer who takes a dive at the moment the Secretary of Defense is shot is named Lincoln Tyler.
- In Reality: The 22-year-old suspect arrested in connection with Kirk’s death is named Tyler Robinson.
The “Tyler” character in the movie have been erroneously taken by social media buzz as Kirk’s shooter, and in reality, many people online believe that the person officially arrested as the suspected shooter, who is also named Tyler, is not the real killer of Charlie Kirk, and that the real gunman is still out there, and worse of all, was hired by a much towering figure.
4. The Location of the Wound
- In the Movie: Charles Kirkland was shot in the neck.
- In Reality: Charlie Kirk was also in the neck.
5. The Trump Connection
As Charlie Kirk was a prominent supporter of Donald Trump, a link to the former President was also established in the movie.
- In the Movie: A major portion of Snake Eyes was filmed at the Trump Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino in Atlantic City, and the mogul character Gilbert Powell is often described in the film as a thinly-veiled allusion to Trump himself. The Trump building was shut down in 2016, and some online buzz mistakenly identifies it as the standing Trump Tower.
Another Instance Of “Predictive Programming”?
The overwhelming consensus from media outlets reporting on this trend would be that there is no evidence of a verified connection between the 1998 Brian De Palma-directed film and the assassination of TPUSA founder, Charlie Kirk – and that is the truth.
Though the striking similarities can also be seen as an “advanced warning” or “disclosure”, which again, conspiracy theories often claimed to be a necessary rule the so-called satanic elite must follow, which again, social media collates in its “hidden in plain sight” collection, it is still what it is, a baseless and unfounded thinking! Right?
However, scientists start with guesses, and symptoms are used successfully and many times to detect an event. So whether Charlie Kirk’s killing is another classic example of mind control to reality, predictive programming, using the media and the television to Tell-A-Vision, Operation Mockingbird, or whatever so-called conspiracy theorists might term it, is up to you.
Let's Hear Your Opinion About Us. Rate Us On:
