The process of seating an impartial jury has proved to be a major obstacle in former President Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York. Jury selection began on Monday, and dozens of potential jurors have already been dismissed due to concerns over their ability to be fair and unbiased.
Out of the initial pool of 96 potential jurors, a staggering 60 were quickly excluded after stating they could not impartially consider the case against Trump.
The trial centers around allegations that Trump directed Michael Cohen, his former attorney, to make a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 election. Prosecutors claim this was done to illegally influence the outcome of the election, which Trump denies.
The high-profile nature of the case, involving a former president who is also a current presidential candidate, has made finding unbiased jurors extremely challenging. One dismissed potential juror was overheard saying, “I just couldn’t do it,” highlighting the difficulties the court faces.
Jury selection continued on Tuesday, with the remaining candidates being carefully questioned about their news consumption habits, prior exposure to Trump, and ability to remain impartial throughout the trial. The judge, Justice Juan Merchan, has ordered the jurors’ identities to be kept anonymous due to the sensitivity of the case.
The judge also rejected a defense request to excuse Trump from attending the trial next Thursday, when he is scheduled to appear before the Supreme Court in another of his criminal cases.
“Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal,” Justice Merchan said, “but a trial in New York Supreme Court… is also a big deal. I will see him here next week.”
