During the recent Republican debate, Vivek Ramaswamy presented a series of unconventional theories, some aligning more with far-right forums than a presidential stage. He questioned the nature of the Capitol riot on January 6th, suggesting it might have been an inside job, and shared controversial and unsubstantiated ideas, including the “Great Replacement” theory, which alleges a deliberate effort to change Western demographics.
The meaning behind some of Ramaswamy’s statements remains unclear, but the “Great Replacement” theory he referenced has a notorious association with far-right ideologies and white genocide conspiracy theories. Despite requests for clarification, Ramaswamy’s campaign did not provide comments.
After the debate, Ramaswamy reposted a message from a white nationalist account, accusing “the left” of intentionally facilitating mass illegal migration. His assertion that federal authorities were involved in planning or executing the Capitol riot echoes far-right narratives, even though evidence points to the energization of Donald Trump’s supporters by his rhetoric.
In subsequent interviews and on social media, Ramaswamy continued to entertain the idea of the Capitol riot being orchestrated by elements like “the deep state” within the US government. This is not the first time he has delved into conspiratorial thinking, having previously mentioned 9/11 conspiracy theories and suggesting government secrecy regarding Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in the attacks.
Ramaswamy’s unconventional statements during the debate garnered support from influential figures on the far right, possibly advancing his cause. Experts note that in the current political climate, where conspiracy theories are not uncommon, Ramaswamy’s turn towards such thinking is not unexpected. Observers, including journalist Mike Rothschild, suggest that Ramaswamy, who initially gained momentum in presidential polling, may be looking beyond the current campaign and strategically cultivating a specific fanbase through his podcast.
Cynthia Wang, an expert in conspiratorial beliefs, notes that in a race where the frontrunner, Donald Trump, often repeats conspiracy theories, Ramaswamy may perceive little risk in bringing up fringe ideas.
